Introduction:

Known for his creative adaptations of mythological stories, Amish Tripathi takes readers on a fascinating journey through the epic story of the Ramayana in his book "Ram." While many have praised how masterfully he has explained the legendary tales of Ramayan for this new generation, others feel that this may be misleading because the book is a work of pure fiction; beyond the characters and a few incidents, the story is an entire work of fiction. 


The book's highlights for me:

1. Ram and Lakshman's Unbreakable Bond:


Amish Tripathi skillfully depicts the relationship between Ram and Lakshman in a realistic and touching way. From their early years, Lakshman's unfailing protectiveness towards his elder brother Ram is beautifully represented. This emotional dimension brings the ancient tale to life by giving the characters a real and charming layer.



2. A Modern View on Lifelong Bonds:


This historical story is given a modern and creative twist by Amish. He offers a unique viewpoint for analyzing the difficulties and complexity of current relationships, relating them to the timeless characters and incidents of the Ramayana. It is remarkable how well the author was able to relate the complexities of the modern world to the ancient tale.



Narratives that I did not like : 


1. An Ancient Tale of Fiction:


One of the main reasons I had doubts about this book "Ram" was the incorporation of fictitious characters and themes into the sacred Ramayana. The introduction of a sister named Roshni, who binds a rakhi to Ram, for example, departs greatly from the traditional narrative. While fiction may serve as a powerful tool, it can also be misleading for readers looking for a genuine picture of the original Ramayana. This may be a source of concern for individuals who are interested in discovering and understanding the timeless story of Ram and Sita.


2.Representing entirely fictitious incidents: 


There are several incidents in this book that are either wholly imaginative adaptations of the original story or altogether made up. For example, the day before Sita's Swayamvar, she asked Raam to meet her in the Royal Garden, where she insisted on pacticing for the ceremony and showed him the 'dhanush'. Raam, on the other hand, rejected. That, however, was not the case. Raam handled everything in the swayamvar naturally and honestly; in reality, they had never met before. 


This makes not much sense because, if Sita wanted Raam to win, she could have requested her father to marry her with Raam, therefore what is the point of swayamvar? Clearly, the creative adaptation lacks in this instance.



I recommend the following to the readers: 


I would recommend "Ram" by Amish Tripathi to readers who already have a complete understanding of the Ramayana and are open to considering a different viewpoint. This book clearly comes within the category of fiction and reinterpretation. "Ram" may not be the best alternative for those looking for a dedicated representation of the ancient tale.



Conclusion:


Amish Tripathi's "Ram" is a contemporary reworking of the timeless epic that highlights the eternal friendship between Ram and Lakshman and gives a contemporary analysis of complex relationships. It does, however, incorporate fictitious aspects that may not meet the expectations of readers looking for a true portrayal of the Ramayana. While this book serves a certain purpose, I suggest it especially to individuals who are already familiar with the original story and are open to new interpretations. Finally, "Ram" is a bold and creative retelling of a beloved story, appropriate for those wishing to see the epic through fresh eyes.